A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 12:30 on January 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested an interview with the head of the Myeon to the head of the Myeon Office located in the Myeon Office of the Myeon in the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Myeon of the Republic of

2. At around 16:00 on February 28, 2014, the Defendant requested an interview with the head of the Myeon, but the interview with the head of the Myeon was refused due to the business trip of the Myeon, and the Defendant threatened B, etc., who is a public official of the above Myeon office, to “I am dead. I am dead. I am dead. I am. I am. I am. I am.) to prevent the Defendant from performing

3. At around 13:00 on March 27, 2014, the Defendant requested a meeting with the face to C, who is a public official of the above Myeon office, working at the above Myeon office, to hold an interview with the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the road, but the interview was refused due to the business trip at the face of the face of the face of the road of the road of the road of the road of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of the Dong of

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence or intimidation against public officials who perform their duties more than three times, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of official duties of the Myeon Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police against C and B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on counseling;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation is that the defendant gets a failure at the face office under the influence of alcohol.