logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.11.24 2016가합100004
총회결의유효확인
Text

1. Of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant B, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim for confirmation of validity of the resolution of the General Meeting on March 20, 2016 is dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) The six comparisons of the network E are F. F. F. F. F. F. H, H, and I between G and his spouse. Of them, D succeeded to the adoption of J, a large house of residence, and the Defendants are descendants of D. E. H, K, and L (the Plaintiff’s representative thereafter, M, the Plaintiff’s representative);

M hereinafter referred to as “M”).

(2) On February 28, 1972, E established the Plaintiff under its initiative to pay the entrance fees to middle school students with the aim of encouraging them to enter middle school students.

B. Name of the draft of the Plaintiff’s New Regulations: Membership of the Party A of the Party A: The resources consisting of the members of the Party A of the Party B of the Party B of the Party C of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B of the Party B. The officer B of the Party B.

The main contents of the above Code shall be as follows:

C. The instant resolution and its past year 1) A died in February 1980, and M, who was his own son, was the Plaintiff’s president, and the Plaintiff’s general affairs were changed from Defendant C to Q, around 1998. 2) The Plaintiff did not participate in D’s subsequent descendants during the attendance of M, N, and Q on November 2, 2014.

arrow