beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.
However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. A. Around the lower end of January 2017, the Defendant received, without compensation, approximately 0.03 grams of phiphonephones located in H in a vehicle parked near G located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu around the lower end of the lower end of January 1, 2017.
(2) The Defendant 23:00 after the date of the crime described in paragraph (1) above, dumping approximately 0.015 grams in water at the Defendant’s office located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I and the third floor.
(3) On March 2017, the Defendant drank approximately 0.015g of clophones in the office of the above Defendant at around 23:00.
Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received and administered philophones, which are a local mental medicine.
B. On March 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received, from the above Defendant’s office, approximately 1g of the hemp that he wraped from B at a gambling place; and (b) smoked once by inserting approximately 0.5g of the hemp in the pipe, by inserting it in a pipe.
(2) The following day after the day of the crime described in the above (1), Defendant 1 smoked once by inserting approximately 0.5g of marijuana in pipes at the above Defendant’s office.
Accordingly, the Defendant smoked marijuana twice.
2. Defendant B
A. At the end of March 2017, the Defendant, at the office of the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I and the third floor, sent approximately 1g of marijuana, enclosed to A, free of charge.
B. On April 2017, the Defendant: (a) posted approximately 0.5g of marijuana in the pipe in the Defendant’s residence located in the JJ of Incheon Vindication-gun; and (b) smoked once with a fire.
Accordingly, the defendant received and smoked marijuana even though he is not a narcotics handler.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect by the prosecution against the defendant and H;
1. Each protocol of the police interrogation of Defendants and H, K, L, and M
1. Protocols of seizure (9) , list of seizure (10) , site of seizure and photographs of seized articles (11) ;
1.Each.