1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the same as the ground for the first instance judgment, except for dismissal or addition as follows:

The following shall be added between 3, 13, and 14 of the judgment of the first instance:

7 On October 6, 2015, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 150 million in the account of the said J.C.

Part 3, 14, and 15 shall be added to the column for recognition of Category 3, "each entry of Evidence A 32 through 34."

The plaintiff alleged that the monthly value of the above H real estate was 7,50,000 won, unlike the first explanation by the defendant B, although it is not sufficient to recognize the facts stated in the evidence No. 53-3 alone.

In addition, the 8th 6th 6th 6th , “the Plaintiff’s 6th 6th 6th ,” which reads “the Plaintiff’s 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 4th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th

by adding "........" in paragraph 8, 19, "...... are difficult to determine and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

“B” and even if it is difficult to set the monthly price of the above H real estate, the monthly price was 7.50,000 won.

In light of the fact that Defendant B created the first priority collective security right in the Plaintiff’s future, including the background leading up to the loan, and that the Plaintiff received dividends equivalent to KRW 109,596,157 in the auction procedure, it is difficult to deem that the Defendants committed a tort against the Plaintiff solely on the basis that there was such difference in the monthly rent amount.

In addition, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to the first instance court and this court alone is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to prove it otherwise.

In addition, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to the first instance court and this court is alone.