1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) On the 6th page 13, "No. B or 9" shall be raised as "B or 9, 13."

(2) On the 8th page, the following shall be added:

D) Meanwhile, the monthly rent contract dated February 20, 200 entered between the supplementary intervenor and the plaintiff on February 20, 200 (Evidence A No. 3) is written in the indication column of real estate, and the "section 3 of this case" is not written, and the monthly rent is 200,000 won. However, according to the recording of telephone conversations between the plaintiff and the supplementary intervenor on January 12, 2012 and January 13, 2012 (Evidence B, No. 1-59), unlike the above monthly rent contract, the part of the plaintiff's land was included in the "land possession of the supplementary intervenor" contract in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, which was located on February 20, 20, and the remaining part of the plaintiff's land was included in the "Seoul rent No. 30,400,000,000 won," and the plaintiff's land was included in the "Seoul rent No. 30,000,000 won."