logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고정335
특수폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:30 on September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim’s face in front of the D restaurant that was located in C, with a string string of the F vehicle of the victim E (38 years old) where the part of the part of the F vehicle of the victim E (38 years old) where the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the F vehicle of the victim E (38 years old), where the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the f in front of the part of the part of the D restaurant that he was in possession of the part of the funeral. The Defendant used the part of the D restaurant that he was in possession of the part of the funeral, which was well aware of the funeral; and (b) used the part of the victim’s face by threatening the victim’s 30 mm in length.

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the fire monm spash and vehicle photographs used for committing the crime;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel on the argument of mental disorder under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, according to the records, the defendant was found to have been drank to a certain extent at the time of the crime of this case, but there was no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

As such, the above assertion is rejected.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow