logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.05.31 2016고정508
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of C options who is a holder of C options.

1. On February 21, 2016, the owner of a motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road that is not covered by mandatory insurance. However, the Defendant operated a Cobserver motor vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the road front of the E hotel located in Pyeongtaek-si D around 09:00.

2. On February 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) took up two-lanes of the road front of the hotel in Pyeongtaek-si D while driving the said observer car at around 09:00; (b) two-lanes from the right edge to the KS6 unit.

There have been two lanes, and all drivers of vehicles operating such places shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the vehicles, and shall not drive the vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as may endanger others according to the traffic conditions of the roads and the structure and performance of the vehicles.

Nevertheless, Defendant 1 neglected the above duty of care and changed the direction to one-lane, and caused a traffic accident attributable to Defendant 1’s front left-hand part of the victim F ( South, 73 years old)’s top wheel of the driver’s Hamna car with the one-lane parallel from K6 parallel to K6 parallel.

In this traffic accident, the Defendant caused damage equivalent to KRW 368,00,000 in estimation of repair by destroying the back wheel wheel of the rocketing taxi of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of damage to property on business negligence), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 (a point of operating an automobile with no mandatory insurance) of the same Act;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

arrow