[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal facts against Defendant A] [criminal records] Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Eunpyeong District Court on September 16, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant omitted the entry of the year in the facts charged on November 28, 2019, but added the content of the facts charged and the year of omission according to the results of the examination of evidence by this court.

Around 22:00, a person driving a DNA low-speed car with approximately 2 km alcohol concentration of about 0.204% from the 2km section to the front road of the same city in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

[Criminal facts of 2019 Highest 2214 against Defendant]

1. Defendant B

A. On November 28, 2019, at around 22:20, the Defendant expressed his intention to offer a bribe in relation to the duties of the police officer in charge of drinking driving by again stating that “one hundred thousand won in cash is required to be considered as a liquor tax” to the slope G belonging to the F District of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station F District, which is a traffic police officer, when a related person A, who was in the front of Pyeongtaek-si, was crackdownd to drive under the influence of alcohol.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (1) of this Article, shacked G with a cash of KRW 300,000 to the effect that he would not drive under the influence of alcohol of G as seen above, and was rejected, and thereby tightly tightly tightly tightly tightly shamped, tightly tightly shacked the right hand and the hand hand hand, and blicked the part of hand.

(2) At around 22:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) prevented A from getting out of the J from getting out of the patrol car in order to measure blood alcohol concentration; (b) assaulted A on one occasion on the left side of the J, on the ground that the police officer belonging to the F District District of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station demands A to comply with blood collection in order to measure blood alcohol concentration.

Accordingly, the defendant is justified.