logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.07.11 2019고단362
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 31, 2007, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) is a person who had the record of having been sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 for a fine of KRW 10,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Eunpyeong District Court on the ground of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On August 13, 2010, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 250,000 for the same crime as the same crime, and on June 10, 2016, the above court received a summary order of KRW 7,00,000 for a fine of KRW 7

Nevertheless, at around 02:05 on March 7, 2019, the Defendant driven an E-owned vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.123% without a vehicle driver's license, from around the front of the Seo-dong branch of the C bank located in Pyeongtaek-si B to the front of the same city D in the same city.

2. The Defendant forged private documents, as described in paragraph (1), required the police officers belonging to the F District District Office of Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station to prepare a report on the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of the state of Pyeongtaek-si, as stated in paragraph (1), and signed the name

Ultimately, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the report on the state-owned driver status statement, which is a private document regarding the certification of facts in G name.

3. The Defendant: (a) submitted to the police officer affiliated with the Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station F District F District Office, who is aware of the fact, a false G owner’s statement in the name, as described in paragraph (2), at the time and place specified in paragraph (2); and (b) presented the report as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Report on the actual state of the driver, report on detection of the driver, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, inquiry reports;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow