1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim for change in the trial, shall be changed as follows:

The defendants are the defendants.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as set forth below 2, and thus, it shall accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the first instance court's 6 to 8, "the result of the physical examination of the G hospital head of this court, the result of the examination of the fact about the G hospital head of this court, and the F hospital head of this court," is the result of the examination of the fact about the G hospital head of the first instance court, the result of the examination of the fact about the G hospital head of the first instance court, and the F hospital head of this court," which is the result of the examination about the F hospital head of this court.

The second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "after the second part of the judgment," and the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, it is possible to cause delay.

In addition, "an appeal" shall be added.

The first instance court's 6th to 7th 6th eth eths are as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was a Chinese company, who completed a master’s degree course in the Chinese NN, before the instant accident occurred, and obtained a doctor’s license, and was paid or scheduled to receive the monthly salary from 30,000 to 100,000 won (based on KRW 5.1 million to KRW 17 million, exchange rate of KRW 170).

In light of the Plaintiff’s academic background, career, etc., the Plaintiff’s lost income should be calculated based on at least 5,335,000 won, which is the average monthly income of all graduate workers who graduated from a graduate school on the report of actual status survey by employment type.

In addition, when the Plaintiff’s labor ability loss rate of 40% and the Defendants’ liability rate of 80%, the Defendants should jointly pay jointly the Plaintiff KRW 437,432,450 [the actual income of KRW 504,832,91 ( KRW 5,335,00 x 40 x 40% x 40% x 46% x 46.65), which corresponds to 409 months from February 4, 2015 to March 25, 2049] x 80% consolation money of KRW 30,000,000], and damages for delay.

[Attachment 17 to 8] 10 of the first instance judgment (excluding the list).