A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2015, the Defendant, while running a business in exchange for Buddhist games in the “E Gameland” located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2015, was to play the role of the so-called “the so-called “the second president” who is going to undergo an investigation instead of the control by an investigative agency, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant’s transfer of the said game hall to the said F; (b) registered the said game hall in the name of the said F; and (c) registered the said game hall in the name of the said F in return for a certain amount of consideration; and (d) registered the said game hall in the competent authority;

The F proposed to the above F, and the F accepted it and conspired to operate the illegal speculative game forum in sequence on the ground that the Defendant was the “the president of the Republic of Korea.”

Accordingly, from March 2015 to April 17, 2015, when the above "E Gameland," unlike the grade classification, the defendant and the above F make it available to customers for use of the changed Schlage 2 game software and Schlage 20 game software to confirm the points that form the basis for the amount to be exchanged to customers, in order to enable customers to confirm the points that are different from the grade classification of the above "E Gameland", the above F shall make it available to customers for use. The defendant and the above F sent a coophone to customers according to the points confirmed by the above method, and let them exchange the above 4,500 won per point on the above coophone at the vicinity of the above game site, and the defendant registered the above game site under the name of the defendant, and received from the above F.150,000 won per day on condition that they are subject to investigation in lieu of the investigation by an investigative agency.

As a result, the defendant in collusion with the above F, provided customers with game products with contents different from the rating classification, and provided customers with a business of returning tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Prosecutions against G, H, I, and J.