logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.24 2013고단1192
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2012, the Defendant purchased 90 million won in total at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name located in Kimhae-si around the beginning of June 2012, Da, E Housing 9 (A, No. 201, B, 201, 302, 401, 402, 501, 502) to the victim C, who became aware of about one month prior to the introduction of 1-month. The purchase price is KRW 350 million in the existing bank loans established in the above house, and the purchase price is KRW 134 million in the remainder of the construction price after the bank received additional loans from 99,000 won, and the remainder of the construction price is 9 billion in the remainder of the construction price after receiving the remainder of 2,400,000 won from the bank, and the remainder of the construction price is 90,000 won in the remainder of 2,600,000 won.”

However, the fact that the construction of the above private factory site was commenced without any construction funds at the time. The owner of the site had already been granted a loan of KRW 600 million as security, and it was difficult to take the progress of the construction because of the wind that did not receive an advance payment of KRW 50 million. Even if the owner of the site has first transferred the ownership of the above house 9 bonds from the victim, it was disposed of, and did not think that it would be used for the repayment of the existing loan or the bank's payment, etc., and did not think that it would be put into the private factory site construction work. On the other hand, G was liable for the liabilities of KRW 64 million, KRW 50 million, and KRW 5 million to H, and KRW 5 million to the community credit cooperative. On the other hand, it was difficult for the owner of the site to pay taxes of KRW 68 million due to the existing business in arrears, and there was no other property or income in the absence of any intention or ability to receive the remaining payment from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant is above.

arrow