logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.27 2015고합767
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Criminal Facts】

1. Indecent acts committed by relatives by force;

A. A. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim C, around August 2005, committed an indecent act by force against the victim, who is the friendship of the Defendant, by inserting his hand in the ward of the Defendant’s residence, and by inserting his hand into the ward of the victim (seven years of age at the time), with the victim’s clothes.

B. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim D, ① was in possession of the Defendant’s residence located in the Defendant’s dwelling space from around 2006 to around 207, and was in possession with the victim (10 to 11 years at the time). The Defendant forced the victim, who was the victim’s relative, by putting his hand in the clothes of the victim’s own victim, and putting him in possession of his chest and drinking part of the victim’s chests from around 2009 to around 2010. ② From around 209 to around 2010, the Defendant was in possession of his fingers with the victim’s (13 to 14 years of age at the time) at the victim’s dwelling space at the victim’s own clothes, and putting his fingers and drinking part of the victim’s chest and drinking part, etc. on two occasions.

2. In around September 201, the Defendant raped by blood, at the Defendant’s residence, the victim C (the age of 13 at that time) and the fluenites, covered the fluenites, and added the television to the victim’s own body, and kis the victim’s chests by putting the fluenites in his/her own body with his/her inner clothes, and brut and resisting the victim’s chests, such as putting his/her head into his/her body, and fluening the victim’s rebuttals, and cutting off the victim’s clothes, and she raped the victim’s fluor, who is a relative of the Defendant by inserting the victim’s fluenites and chests, inserting the Defendant’s sexual organ into the victim’s negative body.

[Judgment of the court below] The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds of appeal, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds of appeal, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

arrow