beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On March 16, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch. On December 30, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime in the same court.
1. Around 03:53 on May 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving a driver without a license) driving a mixed-type vehicle under the influence of alcohol of about 0.189% of the blood alcohol concentration without a motorcycle driver’s license in the section of about 1km from the front side of the Seoyang-gu, Seoyangyang-gu, Seoyangyang-do to the front side of the so-called lusium in the same Eup/Myeon, located in the lusium of the same Eup/Myeon.
2. When the Defendant, at the time and time set forth in the above Paragraph 1, was subject to the identification of his personal information by driving under influence of alcohol at a slope of the Mayang Police Station Police Station, the Defendant entered the above D’s name “E”, “F”, and “0.189%” into the name column of the notification of the result of the PDA Driving Regulations, and then, the Defendant entered the above signature of “E” in the signature column and the measurement column and sent it to the above D.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the signature of E without authority and exercised it.
3. When the Defendant was subject to regulation as above at the date, time, and place specified in the foregoing Paragraph 2, the Defendant made D to prepare “E”, “F”, “F” in the resident registration number column, and “F.189%” and “F.27 May 2016.” on the date of preparation, the Defendant signed E with the driver column and delivered it to the said D as genuinely constituted.
Accordingly, the defendant is named E, a private document concerning a certificate of fact for the purpose of uttering.