logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.10 2015고단2524
업무방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On September 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B in the middle of September 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation work by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes from the above date and making other customers of the said restaurant potable, and obstructing the victim’s restaurant operation work by force, by taking advantage of force, at around 20:0 on September 20, 201, the victim B (the 53 years old), operated by the victim B (the 53 years old), who was in the next table, under the influence of alcohol.

2. On March 14, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendant ordered food to the said restaurant employee at “G cafeteria” operated by the victim E, who was under the influence of alcohol at around 14:0, but the said employee was in a bad condition, and thus, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the victim’s restaurant by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes from the said date by significantly sounding the above employee’s cream at the time, “years, day, day, and day,” and thereby obstructing the operation of the victim’s restaurant by force.

3. On September 18, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim H at around 18:0, the Defendant heard the horses pointing out “I restaurant” operated by the victim H (59 years of age) in Kimhae-si, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 20 minutes from the above date, including, but not limited to, the victim’s 60 male customers under the influence of alcohol, such as “the fact that he did not visit the portrait house” and “the fact that he did not visit the portrait house.”

4. On October 12, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime against the victim B on October 12, 2014, at the place under Paragraph (1) around October 18, 2014, the Defendant deemed that three other customers drink on the table, while under the influence of alcohol, and that three other customers drink on the table without the permission or consent of the customers, and see the said table in combination with the above table and drink the said customers.

arrow