Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 14:43, 2017, the Defendant was driving a one-lane of the six-lanes in front of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-do, Seoul, on the Mapo-do, the Mapo-gu, the Mapo-gu, the Mapo-gu, the direction of the stadium for the stadium.

At all times, there is a point where the left-hand turn and the walking signal can be made to the intersection where the signal, etc. is installed, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the signal or instruction by a person engaged in the duty of driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim E to go beyond the front part of the F motor device bicycle driven by the victim E, who was normally straight in accordance with green signals, in the opposite direction when the defendant neglected it, with the front part of the above car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the so-called so-called so-called the so-called so-called the so-called so-called saves that require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident investigation reports, black booms video CDs and diagnostic certificates;

1. Relevant Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. Normal conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: The first crime is the first crime; the court has agreed that the degree of injury suffered by the victim was significant; and the degree of negligence is not minor; all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and changes theory, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, are considered.