logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.07.29 2016고합102
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

120,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional charges.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the Korea Association of Special Merits (HID) and a person who served as a guard company of E between around 2001 and around 2007 and served as the president of the Korea Association of Special Merits (HID) Seoul branch from around 2008 to around 2015. G is a person who served as a securities broadcasting specialist of H from March 2009 to around 2013, and is a person who served as a securities broadcasting specialist of H from around 2010 to around 2011, and is a space between the Defendant and the social preference.

On May 29, 2015, Part I was prosecuted for violating the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act in relation to the operation of the market price by J (hereinafter “J”) between March 201 and April 201 with respect to the Seoul Southern District Court on May 29, 2015, and was charged with the violation of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. At the same time, he was involved in G and J and K (hereinafter “K”)’s market price.

At the end of 2012, after receiving a request from G to the financial supervisory authorities, etc. to find out whether the case will be a problem in relation to the K market price operation case in which oneself, I, etc. are delayed, the defendant will be a problem to G.

All relevant persons shall be subject to the investigation of financial supervisory agencies, and may be bound by all of them later.

It was true that G received money from a financial supervisory agency under the pretext of the investigation of the financial supervisory agency by means of force on the side of the financial supervisory agency, even with the former president, the prosecutor's office, and the executive branch. Since then, G was asked by G to inquire about whether the financial supervisory agency, etc. will be an issue through the K market price control, and after G was asked by G to inquire about whether the latter would be an issue by the financial supervisory agency, etc., it is problematic with G, and it is necessary to pay money to G in order to make the latter part of the financial supervisory agency by force.

arrow