logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고단1362
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 27, 2007, the Defendant is a person who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol at least twice by receiving a summary order of a fine of two million won due to a violation of road traffic laws at the Daegu District Court, and on May 4, 2012, receiving a fine of four million won due to a violation of road traffic laws at the Daegu District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 28, 2016, the Defendant driven an E-observer vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.140% from the section of about 30 meters from the 1-lane, Nam-gu, Daegu to the front road in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 19:10 on February 19, 201.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving an options car.

On February 28, 2016, around 19:10, the Defendant driven the said car on the front of D in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and led the Defendant to drive the said car on the front of D, one-lane, along with the side road of the one-lane, at the new Heung apartment room, from the new Heung apartment room to the ethic top of the ethic speed.

At that time, there was a duty of care to accurately operate steering gear and brakes and to ensure safe speed and method by properly operating steering steering gear and brakes and checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver of the driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not avoid the above damaged vehicle due to the negligence that he neglected to take a brake system while under the influence of alcohol as stated in the above paragraph (1). The defendant did not avoid the above damaged vehicle due to the negligence that caused the above damaged vehicle. The part of the front part of the driver's vehicle operated by the defendant was the front part of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the Victim F, such as catum salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and was accompanied by the damaged vehicle.

arrow