Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B Poter Cargo Vehicles.

On April 4, 2016, around 15:10, the Defendant moved by right at a speed of less than 20 km in the direction of a roadside hospital from the surface of the rock bridge to the 642-distance intersection of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu.

At this time, there was a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the signals of the signal apparatus to a person engaged in driving along an intersection with a signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the opposite direction of the vehicle under the direction of the victim C (40) driving, which is to turn to the left in accordance with the new subparagraph, due to the negligence of the bypassing the vehicle in violation of the signal, was shocked with the front part of the vehicle under the direction of the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury in need of 8 weeks’ medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence by the Defendant, which caused the victim to suffer from the injury in need of 8 weeks’ medical treatment due to the external rash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A report on internal investigation (applicable to a violation of signal);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the intensity of signal systems to the intersection of a vehicle photograph or an accident site;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated