logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.06.08 2017고정437
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant charged with the instant charges is a person who drives a passenger car in B SP car.

On August 8, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 15:13, and proceeded to turn to the left in the direction D from the direction of the Si/Gun/Gu maritime police station in the Gunsan City.

At that time, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, and in the case of the defendant's vehicle, the same passenger was on board.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a motor vehicle that drives the motor vehicle along the intersection by reducing speed and checking well the direction of the road, and to prevent the accident in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, it was neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal, and was proceeding in the direction of the direction of the direction of the Roster-ro D on the side of the direction.

The upper part in front of the left-hand side of the vehicle driven by E ( South, North, South, South) was shocked by the upper part of the vehicle to the right-hand side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered damages to the victim G (the 60-year life, female) who was on board the chief of the mediation due to negligence in the course of his duties, due to the lack of an open room where two weeks of medical treatment is required.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant, since the investigation agency, has consistently made a left turn to the left according to the signals of the traffic signal apparatus and did not make a left turn to the left in violation of the traffic signal, and the instant accident was caused by the illegal turn to the left on the road above the bank where the signal apparatus is not installed and the accident was not caused by his negligence.

B. According to the provisions of Article 3(2)1 and Article 4(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, in the case of operating a vehicle in violation of signals by signal apparatus, a public prosecution is instituted even in the case of purchasing an insurance or mutual aid under Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

arrow