logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단583
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the defendant B is above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B is the owner of the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building F (hereinafter “instant building”) and Defendant A is the actual operator of “G” who conducts remodeling of the building, interior works, etc.

Defendant

B The purpose of changing cafeterias and real estate offices on the first floor of the building of this case to the Dorop sales store (pon sales store) is to remove the boundary walls between the 4 households on the second floor of the building without permission for substantial repairs and newly string them into the so-called "studio", and the 3 households among them are changed to the so-called "studio", the remaining 1 households are extended to 5 households, such as dividing them into 2 households, and the number of households on the third floor were in the 3rd floor.

1. A household shall endeavor to undertake remodeling works for a building that includes the details, etc. of substantial repair of the building in this case by means of expanding or dismantling the boundary walls between households in multi-family houses, such as dividing into two households, etc., and enter into a standard contract for construction works with the defendant A on May 30, 2016, which is KRW 132 million in the contract amount with the defendant A on May 30, 2016, and 2016.

6. 27. 27. Around the two-lane contract entered into only 4,950 full contract amount.

In order to repair a building from a large scale, the Defendants confirmed the structural safety of the building in accordance with the Building Act in accordance with the structural standards stipulated by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and completed construction with permission from the competent authorities, along with relevant documents. In particular, the building of this case was in a situation where it is difficult to support the normal load due to cracks, such as there was a gold level of 1.5 cm on the 2 columns of the first floor, and two sn beam beam lines were installed on the beams located in the columns to reinforce the building. Since part of the wall of the first floor was removed, the above gold columns were supported by the increased load compared to the original load, and there was a gold level of 1.5 cm in width and 2.5 cm in length on the outer wall of the second floor.

arrow