Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. In cases where the Defendant is the owner of a multi-family house (one story 1 household, two story 3 household, three story 1 household), which is a multi-family house of 262.5 square meters in the site area in the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the large-scale repair of the building, which is a land area of 262.5 square meters in the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from December 30, 2015 to February 28, 2016, received permission for large-scale repair from the chemical market without obtaining permission, and by expanding or dismantling the boundary walls between households in the above multi-family house, the Defendant repaired one-story household to two households, and three-story household to two households.

2. In cases where the defendant of a multi-family house D in Sung-si is the owner of a multi-family house (one-story household, two-story household, three-story household) with a site area of 293.2m2m2, total floor area of 481.2m2m2, building area of 150.78m2 in 150, and multi-family house with a three-story area located in Sung-si, which is located in an urban area, the defendant shall obtain prior permission from the head of the Gu/Si/Gun in order to repair the

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from December 30, 2015 to February 28, 2016, repaired the two-story household into four households by expanding or dismantling the boundary walls between households in the above multi-family house without obtaining permission for substantial repair from the chemical market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each E statement;

1. Written accusation of the chemical market;

1. An application for approval for use of the current status of each violation of the Building Act;

1. Ground plans, on-site photographs, and details of large-scale repairs [the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the act of repairs under paragraph (2) of the facts charged does not constitute the act of substantial repairs requiring the permission of the mayor. However, according to the evidence above, according to the above evidence, the defendant removed a multi-use room and a kitchen, incorporated a part of a household area into a part of a living room area, and completed construction work,

1. Article 108 of the Building Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 108 (1) of the Building Act which selects punishment;