logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.10 2009고정3219
일반교통방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2008, a civil society organization with 1,500 U.S. beef co-operation, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Countermeasures") organized a "National Countermeasure Committee against the full import of U.S. beef risks" (hereinafter referred to as the "Countermeasures Committee") for the purpose of organizing a strike against the import of U.S. beef, asserting that "the phased import expansion agreement of U.S. beef entered into with the Government of the Republic of Korea on April 18, 2008 is a duplicative negotiation, as well as a result of undermining the citizens' health rights."

Since May 2, 2008, the countermeasures conference led to the candlelightlight assembly in Seoul, etc., which was held from May 6, 2008, such as the "Ctan nuclear strike jointly and severally," and "Smi.net, etc., and tried to enter the Cheongdae, etc., by holding a candlelight assembly, which is an outdoor assembly at night, every day from May 6, 2008. From May 24, 2008, the countermeasures conference tried to play a road-only demonstration, such as a three-dimensional city, following the candlelightlight assembly, and by proceeding to enter the Cheongdae.

On the other hand, the government announced the results of additional negotiations on the expansion of import of U.S. beef on June 21, 2008, but the countermeasures meeting continued to hold a candlelight assembly by asserting the complete renegotiation rather than the additional negotiations.

On August 5, 2008, the countermeasures conference held a candlelight assembly from around 19:20 to 19:50 of the day when 2,700 members of the countermeasures conference were present.

At that time, from around 19:36 to 20:20 on August 5, 2008, the Defendant participated in the foregoing candlelight meeting with D, etc., along with D, in the so-called “Sale-gu Cheongdong-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong Sale-dong-dong-dong Sale-dong-dong-dong Sale-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu.” The Defendant occupied the above candlelight meeting, along with the above candle

As a result, the defendant is in collusion with the military participating in the above candlelight assembly.

arrow