Defendants are not guilty.

Indictment

1. On January 20, 2014, Defendant A is a representative of Defendant D, F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant J, Defendant M, Defendant P, Defendant P, Defendant Q, Defendant R, and Defendant S, who are members of the association, organized “The head of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the NMM in the territory of the Republic of Korea, the head of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the NM, Defendant C, the head of the office of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the NM, the head of the office of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the NM, Defendant C, the head of the welfare office of the Gu, Defendant C, the auditor of the branch of the Gu, Defendant C, the auditor of the branch of the Gu, and Defendant A as the representative of the operation committee.

The Defendants, in the process of concluding the collective agreement with X company in 2015, demanded several negotiations to guarantee union activities, such as the increase of four full-time officers, guarantee of permanent union hours, guarantee of safety, etc. such as occupational safety and health participation, support for part of school expenses, etc., etc., which are 50,000 won increase, etc., on several occasions. However, as the negotiations have been concluded with the company due to the difference between the company and the company, the Defendants reported an outdoor assembly and held an assembly in advance from December 4, 2015 under the pretext of “an urging to eradicate labor pressure and to faithfully negotiate with the aim of achieving the demand for labor union.”

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On December 22, 2015, from around 07:28 to 08:15 on the same day, the Defendants reported to hold a meeting in front of the victim X emotional, such as the record of the above basic facts. However, even though the security guards, who are engaged in the duty of controlling access to vehicles and personnel, violated the AB’s control over access to the vehicles and personnel, and violated the AB’s demand for withdrawal from the X labor team Vice-head AC on several occasions, and did not comply with such demand, the Defendants, despite having received a demand for withdrawal from the X labor team Vice-head AC on several occasions, raised the labor price by raising the demand by 2 heat from the centering on access roads to the emotional. The Defendants divided the front door against visitors.