logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.05.24 2015고정272
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant B of 2,000,000 won, Defendant C, D, and E of each fine of 1,00 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Fact-finding] Defendant A’s head of the Democratic Labor Union J branch, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant F’s head of the same site of the same branch, Defendant C, Defendant D’s employee of the same branch, Defendant F as the head of the division of the same branch, and Defendant F’s head of the K branch of the same branch. The Defendants were willing to avoid the attendance of the workers who want to work at the above construction site on the ground that they were holding an assembly before the assembly on September 24, 2014, when they demanded the prevention of unfair dismissal, etc. at the construction site from September 24, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant E, and Defendant F’s joint criminal acts committed from October 6, 2014 to October 07:30, 201, the Defendants prevented the victim’s N workers from entering the work on the day by preventing them from entering the work by preventing the victim’s N workers from entering the work by preventing 20 employees from entering the work at the scene, along with 20 staff members of the Democratic Labor Team around the site in front of the aforementioned MM site.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the victim N MM work by force.

2. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant F’s joint crimes committed from around 06:40 to around 07:10 on October 7, 2014, the Defendants prevented the Defendant from working on the day by preventing the victim’s N from entering the work site by blocking 20 staff members of a democratic labor union from entering the site at the place specified in paragraph (1) and preventing them from entering the site by preventing them from entering the work site, such as P, Q, R, and S.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the victim N MM work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statement in the first and second public trial records

1. The witness's statement in T court among the second trial records;

1. Each written statement prepared by theO or U;

1. Construction work report attached to the police statement protocol against T;

1. Details of work logs and deposits and withdrawals relating to equipment;

1. Evidence photographs (the Defendants only held a meeting before the construction site entrance on the date and time stated in the facts constituting the crime and belong to the victim.

arrow