beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In the event of an injury, the Defendant did not interfere with the business of the victim D, and the Defendant was assaulted by the victim, but the lower court convicted all of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine or misapprehending the legal doctrine.
B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The lower court’s determination as to the assertion of mistake of facts comprehensively adopted and examined the following circumstances, namely, ① the victim D, at an investigative agency and the court of the lower court, the Defendant parked the vehicle at around January 19, 2015 at a volume of 20-30 minutes at the inside of the access road to the construction site and obstructed the Defendant from allowing access by the construction vehicle. From January 20, 2015 to January 23, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the entry of the construction site by preventing access to the construction site by blocking the access road to the construction site at a low speed. On January 23, 2015, the victim D requested the movement of the vehicle by the victim D upon his/her request on the movement of the vehicle, thereby causing injury, such as harming the victim D’s d’s d’s bomb and damaging the bom around the road.
(2) The victim E also stated in the investigative agency and the court of the court below that the defendant was unable to install a ccoon vehicle on the access road to the construction site on January 19, 2015, and the defendant was unable to enter the construction site on January 23, 2015, and was subject to violence by the defendant on January 23, 2015.
(3) At the investigative agency and the court of the court below, the above defendant's above acts of interference and injury have been observed.
(4) In light of the fact that the victim D was diagnosed on January 23, 2015, the victim E was diagnosed on January 23, 2015, the salt pans and tensions of the erode of the erode, the erode of the erode, the erode of the erode, the erode of the erode, and the erode of the erode, etc., the Defendant is the coke or the eroke as stated in the lower judgment.