beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.
The defendants are the defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A In order to oppose the construction of a chemical E-factory, A is the chairperson of the chemical metropolitan committee composed of representatives of neighboring village organizations, Defendant B is the same member of the committee as this Chapter, and Defendant C is the H of the same committee.
On June 3, 2013, the Defendants conspired with 30 village residents living nearby the construction site to obstruct the above construction of victims by installing a tent counter to the access road at the construction site or parking a vehicle such as a truck, and mobilization of residents so as to prevent them from entering the construction vehicle, such as dump truck, etc., on the grounds that the K-Center construction is carried out by J farming association corporation and the victim Skjin Construction is being carried out, and the operation of the K-Center construction is likely to cause damage to residents due to bad malodor.
On June 3, 2013, between 30 village residents and 17:00 on the same day, the Defendants installed a tent so that village residents may violate the road. Defendant C parked in the access road of the freight truck owned by himself/herself, Defendant B extracted a construction opposite flag at the site, displayed the victim’s employees, and took a bath, and Defendant A prevented them from entering the site of the construction vehicle by such means as ordering residents to act on the site.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with 30 village residents and interfered with the victim's construction work.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing M's statutory statement;
1. Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act appears to be the attitude of the Defendants to recognize and reflect the instant crime in this Court, and the Defendants’ participation in the instant crime.