A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on August 31, 2017, was sentenced to three years and six months after the suspension of execution on September 8, 2017, for a special robbery in the Changwon District Court’s territorial branch, and was finally sentenced to three years and six months after the suspension of execution.

When the Defendant finds any vehicle, such as a horse, sprink, sprink, sprink, etc., among parked vehicles, using the string of a specific vehicle with the knowledge of the string of the string, he was able to open the door by using the string and to steals the goods in the vehicle.

On January 27, 2019, the Defendant discovered the e-mailed vehicle owned by the victim D that was parked in front of the C cafeteria located in the C cafeteria B at the macroscam on January 27, 2019. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) opened the door of the said vehicle in a manner that she gets up on the locking device by a half the string line prepared in advance; (b) opened the door of the said vehicle in a manner that she gets up the locking device; and (c) taken out the paper bags with a cash amounting to 200,000 won owned by

In addition, from March 15, 2019 to March 01:34, 2019, the Defendant stolen a total of 2,58,000 won of the market price on four occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D, F, G, and H;

1. Attachment of the site photographs, CCTV images extractions, and the attachment of each photograph;

1. Criminal records: The application of inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (the attachment of criminal records and court records during the period of suspension of execution of sentence);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of each of the above crimes), and the choice of imprisonment;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, the Defendant alleged to the effect that he was in a state of mental disorder, mental retardation, or mental retardation at the time of committing the instant crime. However, in light of the various circumstances indicated in the record, such as the applicable method and frequency of the instant crime, the Defendant’s behavior before and after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant has no ability or ability