1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The thesis" in the 8th judgment of the court of first instance as "a certificate of expected publication of the thesis" (as stated in the certificate, the relevant paper is published in Femin No. 51 (No. 221) of the "G" printed and published on June 30, 2016; "the plaintiff" in the 12th judgment of the same side is added to "the paper"; "this decision" in the 10th judgment as "the court of first instance"; and "this decision" in the 6th judgment of the court of first instance is added to "the court of first instance"; and it is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment at the court of first instance as follows, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As examined in the above cited part of the judgment added, it is reasonable to view that the defendant's rejection disposition of re-election against the plaintiff of this case against the plaintiff has lost objective legitimacy by fulfilling objective duty of care in view of the general university as a standard. The defendant's testimony of the witness H at the trial upon the defendant's request is insufficient to reverse the factual basis or determination in this part of the above cited part, and thus, the defendant's argument in the grounds of appeal against this point is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.