logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.09.06 2018나2066136
임금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that the court's ruling of the first instance is identical to that of the first instance court, except for the addition of the judgment in the next instance trial, since the reasons for the court's explanation as to this case are the same as that of the second instance court's ruling, since the first instance court's ruling of the fourth instance and the 15th 19 and 20th 15th 15th 19 and 20th 15th 19 are deleted.

2. As seen in the above cited part of the judgment added, the second suspension disposition is remarkably unfair in terms of social norms, and thus, the defendant abused the discretionary power of disciplinary action. The defendant's assertion on the grounds for appeal that the defendant's ground for appeal is inconsistent with the above cited part of this part is insufficient to reverse the factual recognition or judgment on the facts of the above cited part of this part, on the sole basis of the aforementioned evidence Nos. 2, 6-1 through 4, 9, 10, 17, 19, 25, and 26-1 through 4, respectively.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow