A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2132"

1. From March 2015 to April 2015, the Defendant: (a) the victim F, who was introduced from E, the Defendant’s seat at a coffee shop near the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Seoul Seomun-gu Ga”); and (b) the Defendant is scheduled to auction the Defendant’s head of the Seoul Seomun-gu G Ga and B 1st floor; and (c) so, he can see it at present

The plan to redevelopment at H, which is operated by the above-mentioned lending No. 4, shall be deemed to be a large profit if sold later.

The phrase “the victim shall be given a loan of KRW 170 million to the victim to pay the down payment and the intermediate payment, and 204 listed in the bill of indictment No. 4 of the above loan No. 1 floor B in the victim’s name was an obvious clerical error in the register of transfer of ownership.

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant received from the victim on May 12, 2015 an amount of KRW 550 million under the account of the National Bank (J) bank account (J) in the name of the Defendant’s partner, and kept for the victim, the Defendant arbitrarily consumed the total of KRW 40 million as shown in the annexed crime list from May 12, 2015 to May 27, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. The Defendant, around May 2015, lent a down payment of KRW 30 million to the Victim K in Seoul around May 2015, if “L is short of the down payment to construct four Dongs above the fifth floor above the ground” to the Victim K by June 20, 2015.

The registration certificate No. 4 on the first floor of Seodaemun-gu G is provided as security.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, and the Defendant borrowed the name of F as stated in paragraph 1 of the Seodaemun-gu G No. 4 of the said Seodaemun-gu. Therefore, the Defendant was unable to offer it as security.

Nevertheless, on May 30, 2015, the Defendant was issued KRW 30 million to the account in the name of a national bank (J) in the name of the Defendant’s birth under the name of the Defendant’s birth on the pretext of a false statement as above from the injured party.

"2017 Highest 2316"

1. The defendant shall be M. M. of a private document forgery and the uttering of a falsified investigation document.