A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant will pay 86 million won to the applicant through fraud.

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2014, the Defendant paid off KRW 100,000,00,000,00 to the Victim C at the law firm I office located in the Gu Government-Si of Ha on October 6, 2014.

If money is not repaid at the time, it was called to the effect that it will be repaid in lieu of the loan No. 304 and 404.

However, at the time, the Defendant was proceeding with the construction of the loan in the name of K, which is a dynamic with bad credit standing. In purchasing the loan site, the Defendant was in the state of establishing a collateral security of the maximum amount of KRW 585 million to the Sungnam Central Credit Union, and in addition, the Defendant was in the state of establishing a collateral security of the maximum amount of KRW 585 million with L, M, etc., as well as the Defendant was in arrears with wages at the construction site, and there was no intention or ability to change the due date even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party,

Nevertheless, the Defendant was made a false statement and was transferred KRW 90 million from the victim to the K bank account in the name of K on the same day.

On August 27, 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that “Around 2015, the Defendant would have paid the price to the victimO by constructing a five-story Do-J building with the five-story Do-J by September 2014, the Defendant would have to pay it by September 2014.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was proceeding with the construction of the loan in the name of K, which was under the bad credit standing without any specific property. In purchasing the loan site, the Defendant was in the state of setting up a collateral security of the maximum amount of KRW 585 million to the Sungnam Central Credit Union, and in addition, the Defendant was in the state of setting up a collateral security of the maximum amount of KRW 585 million with L, M, etc., as well as the Defendant was liable for a large amount of debt from L, M, etc., due to the delinquency of wages at the construction site and the Defendant

Nevertheless, the defendant is the above.