1. The defendants' appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance and the grounds for incidental appeal by the Plaintiff are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance was presented to this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: “1,00,000 won” in the 9th 3th Myeon of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be “1,00,000,000 won”; “a broker” in the 5th Myeon 1; “a broker” in the 3th Myeon 3 shall be “a broker”; “affiliated broker” in the 5th Myeon 5th Myeon 5 shall be “a broker”; “a broker” in the 5th Myeon 5th Myeon 5 shall be “a practicing licensed real estate agent”; and “a broker” in the 6th Myeon 6th Myeon 1 shall be cited as the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the broker is deemed to be

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants and incidental appeals by the Plaintiff are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.