logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 06. 23. 선고 2016두37652 판결
(심리불속행) 상고이유에 관한 주장은 특례법 제4조 제1항 각 호에 정한 사유를 포함하지 아니하거나 이유가 없다[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-5672 (Law No. 29, 2016)

Title

The ground of appeal on the ground of appeal is without merit or does not include the grounds prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic.

Summary

(C) The amount of the secured debt should be included in the acquisition value of the land because it is impossible to obtain the right of indemnity even if the right of collateral is cancelled or the secured debt of this case is repaid, and the secured debt of this case is additionally liable for the secured debt.

Cases

2016Du37652 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

UO

Defendant, Appellant

OO Head of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

March 29, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

June 23, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal do not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court or are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow