logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2020.08.11 2020가단1563
근저당권말소
Text

1. On September 20, 2019, the Defendant received on September 20, 201 from the Daejeon District Court, the competent registry office of the Daejeon District Court.

Reasons

1. The fact that the registration of establishment of a collateral security (hereinafter “registration of establishment of a collateral security”) was completed on September 20, 2019 on the real estate stated in the separate list of the judgment on the cause of the claim as to September 20, 2019, by the Daejeon District Court, Jin-si Registry of Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court) No. 600 million won of the maximum debt amount, the debtor, the plaintiff and the creditor, and the defendant (hereinafter “registration of establishment of a collateral security”) was not disputed between the parties. According to the evidence No. 2 of subparagraph B of the same Article, from September 20, 2019 to October 28, 2019, until the time when the registration of establishment of the collateral security of this case was completed, the agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant was completed on September 20, 2019 to the account under the name of the plaintiff and the total amount of KRW 22,1685,400,000.

1) The Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff borrowed 200 million won from the Defendant to pay interest on the existing collateral loan and the litigation cost for divorce with C. However, the existing collateral security established on real estate listed in the attached list was established at around September 2014 with the maximum debt amount of 18 million won, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that there was a change in economic situation to the extent that the interest on the loan was not paid after five years thereafter, and there is no evidence to support that the above claim of the Defendant was required to pay the divorce litigation cost to a maximum of 200 million won. 2) From September 20, 2019 to October 28, 2019, the above claim of the Defendant is difficult to believe. However, the Defendant possessed the passbook from around September 20, 2019 to around September 20, 2019 to the account under the Plaintiff’s name.

arrow