logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.02.17 2014가합54936
매매대금
Text

1.(a)

Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay to Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KRW 171,443,747 and KRW 160,787,152 among them.

Reasons

On September 13, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendants to exchange each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2,4,000,000 won in the market price of the Plaintiff-owned (hereinafter “instant one real estate”) and each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which is the Defendants’ market price of KRW 615,00,000 (hereinafter “instant two real estate”). The Defendants paid KRW 530,000 to the Plaintiff in cash out of the difference in the market price of each of the above real estate; the Defendants transferred the secured debt of KRW 77,00,000,000 in the name of agricultural cooperatives established in the instant real estate No. 1, and KRW 2,50,000,000,000,000,000,000 and KRW 2,50,000,000,000 in the title of the said real estate; and the Plaintiffs acquired each of the real estate No. 2,71,5,5,00,0,0,0.

On October 4, 2013, the Plaintiff transferred the ownership of the instant real estate to the Defendants. The Defendants paid KRW 200 million out of the supplement amount to the Plaintiff, and acquired KRW 145 million as collateral obligations of the collateral security right in the name of the agricultural cooperative under the name of the agricultural cooperative established in the instant real estate, and the obligation of returning the lease deposit. The Plaintiff paid KRW 200 million as collateral obligations of the collateral security right in the name of the agricultural cooperative established in the instant real estate, and paid KRW 100 million on behalf of the said agricultural cooperative in advance, and paid KRW 200 million as collateral obligations of the collateral security right in the name of the new cooperative, which was established in the instant real estate. The Defendants did not take over KRW 250 million as collateral obligations of the collateral security right in the name of the new cooperative, which was established in the instant real estate. The instant real estate was the real estate of this case to the Plaintiff.

arrow