beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
Reasons
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) the Defendant could recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Victim F as stated in the facts charged; (b) the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case, contrary to what is alleged in the facts charged, erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. Determination
A. On October 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on October 2, 2013, the Defendant: (b) 14:00, the Government of the Republic of Korea, on the ground that the Victim F (74 years of age) was able to visit a survey official, “the survey is scambling; hereinafter the same shall apply)”; and (c) carried the victim’s chest over the upper part of the upper part of the charges, thereby cutting down the victim’s chest over the upper part of the upper part of the wall that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.
B. The lower court’s judgment: (a) stated to the effect that: (a) the victim F was released at the first time after the victim F stated that the Defendant was sealed, and then reversed the statement that the Defendant was pushed down; (b) the victim F was pushed down to himself; (c) according to CCTV images at the time, the Defendant continued to put the Defendant in the position; and (d) the victim F was on the side of the chemical team, and the Defendant was in the front side of the chemical team; and (c) the witness G was sealed by the Defendant at the court of the lower judgment with two fingers; (e) the witness G was used without awareness, and was f was reduced, and reported to other persons; and (e) the victim was aware of F until 119 was reported, but according to CCTV images at the time, the victim F was found to have been aware of the cause of the injury, not only by the time when the victim immediately reported the phone, but also by the time when it appears to have relied on the cause of the injury.