Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for two years, each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Recognizing that subsidies are not provided to individuals and only those of farmers who wish to produce eco-friendly agricultural products with at least 10 participating groups, etc. who wish to produce eco-friendly agricultural products, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant received subsidies in the name of EF (EF number 14) “the number of participating farmers”) and received them by fraud.”

The Defendant submitted a false application for subsidies to the effect that “The small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the medium group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the group of the small group of the group of the small group of the group of the group of the small group of the group of the group of the small group of the group

On the other hand, subsidies shall be paid to those who operate a subsidized project and are prohibited from using them for other purposes. In fact, the defendant did not intend to engage in a joint production project of environment-friendly agricultural products in the name of the EM group, and the author groups did not intend to participate in the above joint project. Therefore, the defendant and the above author groups did not engage in the subsidized project.

In addition, the Defendant applied for the above subsidy in order to establish the Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju District and the agricultural products collection center in his own land and did not aim to carry out the intended business.

On March 31, 2009 and September 1, 2009, the Defendant received a total of KRW 76,80,000,00 from the time when he was permanently stationed in the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (2) below, applies for a false subsidy in the name of a author group as if he/she was engaged in a joint business, thereby helping the Defendant obtain a subsidy from a large amount of green growth district support projects.