logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.24 2014고단4203
사기등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant H, on December 16, 201, was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for the purpose of aiding and abetting fraud in the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office.

1. In around 2009, Defendant A participated in the project for the creation of a development project for the eco-friendly farming industry in Daejeon-gu from 2009 to 2013 by organizing a “Shub group” in which farmers living in the Daejeon-gu area participate and ties between men, rice and environment-friendly fertilizers, etc., and participated in the project for the creation of a complex for the development of the eco-friendly farming industry.

The above subsidized project is to subsidize certain expenses to assist the environmental conservation of rural communities and the production of safe agricultural products through the distribution of the Environment-Friendly Agriculture Act (rice, the purchase of strings, strings, and eco-friendly fertilizers).

Around March 2009, the Defendant applied for the participation of the subsidized project operator on behalf of the public official in charge of the Daejeon Seo-gu Office for the participation of the subsidized project on April 21, 2009. The details of the application are required for KRW 50,329,000 in total project cost, which was set at KRW 20,132,00 in detail, and KRW 30,197,00 in total, and thus, the Defendant should pay the said subsidized project cost to receive the said subsidy.

In order to receive the full amount of the above subsidies, the Defendant did not intend to pay the said subsidies, and did not pay the total amount of the expenses actually spent by issuing a false tax invoice stating the purchase price, etc. of rice with the intent to receive the total amount of the subsidies.

On June 30, 2009, the Defendant submitted a false tax invoice in which the amount of purchase, such as rice, etc. issued by T, to the above public officials, and a false tax invoice in which the e-mail between U was issued by the above public officials, and applied for a subsidy and received KRW 30,197,00 on June 30, 200 from the e-mail-gu Office of Victims to the Agricultural Cooperative account under the name of the Defendant.

arrow