logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 07. 11. 선고 2016두476 판결
(심리불속행) 중간지급조건부 용역공급의 공급시기 및 익금의 귀속시기[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-1696 ( October 09, 2016)

Title

(C) The time when the supply of the service upon interim payments is made and the time when the earnings accrue.

Summary

(Summary) The time of supply for services subject to interim payments is the time of each payment is made, and if the parties agree to delay the time of payment prior to the arrival of each installment payment, the time of supply for services and the time of attribution of earnings may be changed accordingly, but such agreement may not affect the time of supply of value-added tax after the time of installment payment.

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du476 Decided revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

A, a corporation

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Seocho Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2015Nu1696

Imposition of Judgment

July 7, 2016

Text

1. All appeals are dismissed

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow