logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.08.22 2013고정104
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving vehicles B.

1. Around 01:35 on January 27, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (ex post facto action) (hereinafter “MM vehicle”) driven by BM vehicle driven by C(21 years old), which was driven by C(21 years old), going from the upper dong of Jung-gu to the front of the GS25 convenience point of the GS25 convenience store in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, had the vehicle driven by C(21 years old) to turn to the left and pushed down the center line along the flow of the vehicle.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle shall thoroughly perform the duty of vision and properly drive the steering gear of the motor vehicle. However, the defendant, with the front part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the driver's license, received the rear wheels part of the above BMW vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the driver's license, destroyed the BM vehicle so that the 23.60,000 won left side of the above BM vehicle can be repaired, and caused the traffic obstacle of other vehicles travelling along the road at the center of the road without taking any measure.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the time of the accident, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.148 percent of the blood alcohol concentration at the same time as that of the preceding paragraph, driven the said routing vehicle within a four-km radius of approximately four kilometers from the street in front of the remote city apartment 305-dong in order to pass through a regular Eup 305-dong in front of the regular Eup, and driving the said routing vehicle at the distance of about 305-dong, which is the place of departure of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2), on-site photograph, and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the statement of the situation of a driver;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148, Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2(2)2 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of which measures are not taken after an accident), and Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44(1)

arrow