A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 15, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Jeonju District Court's branch court's support on March 15, 2005, a fine of one million won for the same crime at the Jeonju District Court's former District Court on August 27, 2008, and a fine of one million won for the same crime in the Jeonju District Court's branch court's support on April 29, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 19:25 on April 14, 2013, the Defendant driven B rocketing car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.145% in the section of about 5km from the front of the main apartment in the hydro-Eup hydro-Eup-Myeon to the front of the exclusive apartment in the same Si-Eup-dong.

As a result, the Defendant, even though having committed a drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle again under the influence of alcohol.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car.

On April 14, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on April 19, 2013, and led to the intersection of a three-distance intersection in front of the Dong elementary school located in the name of the head of a regular Eup/Myeon according to one-lane from the jurisdiction of the office of education of the regular Eup/Myeon in the front of the Eup/Myeon.

In such a case, the driver of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and the steering system of the motor vehicle, as the victim C is driving a taxi in the second way in the same direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.145%, was negligent in proceeding in the vicinity of two-lanes, and caused the victim taxi to get the back side of the victim taxi to the right side side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the 1,378,923 taxi owned by the victim due to the above occupational negligence and escaped without immediately stopping the said taxi and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;