Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant B, together from July 25, 2013 to 18:50 on the same day, continued to engage in a bath theory on the ground that the victim did not sell alcohol to the Defendants while drinking alcohol at the “E cafeteria” restaurant operated by the victim D in Gyeonggi-si, Namyang-si. However, even though there were other customers in the said restaurant, Defendant A continued to engage in a bath theory, such as “I am shotle, I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see that I am shotle, I would like to gather the food that was in the said restaurant, and Defendant B did not gather the dispute, and that I would like to go back to the restaurant.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the cafeteria operation of the victim.

2. Defendant A used the victim F’s face at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the same time and place, and used the victim F’s face to mislead the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act