A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, in collusion with C, committed as if he was a person with the power of C with a person who intends to be employed in a broadcasting station or airline, and was a person who can exercise influence over the personnel affairs of the agency, and received money and valuables on the pretext of school expenses from the victims.

1. Around June 9, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim D, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “E” restaurant located in the Chungcheongnam-nam Gong, and that “A victim D who wishes to work as the Korean Broadcasting System (KBS), who is a senior public official, is a member of the office, and who is well aware of the persons related to the Korean Broadcasting System, will be employed as the teaching program, and will be employed as the teaching program, with the amount of KRW 30 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

However, the Defendant was not well aware of whether C was a person performing his work, and there was no conviction that C was able to find employment for the victim. Since C received money from the victim, it was thought that C would use it as personal living expenses, etc., even if the Defendant received money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to find employment with Korea Broadcasting System.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with C, by deceiving the victim as above, and by deceiving the victim from the victim under the pretext of teaching expenses, acquired the total sum of KRW 30 million from June 17, 2013 and KRW 20 million on June 28, 2013 from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of the Defendant.

2. The Defendant, around July 2013, listened to the victim F, who was aware of the victim F, was unable to be employed as an airline crew by the victim F, who was the victim F, and around that time, sought that the victim was unable to be employed as an airline crew. The purport of the Defendant’s crime against the victim’s F is that “A high-ranking public official who was on duty at the general premium room by an airline, who was working in the house, was a senior public official at the househouse, but was well aware of the persons concerned, 30 million won to be used for the school program, will be employed as an Asian or air crew member.”