logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 05. 29. 선고 2014두3280 판결
주요경비에 대한 지출 증빙이 없어 매입비용, 임차등의 범위와 증빙서류의 종류 고시 제3항 다목을 적용할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2013Nu22507 (Law No. 15, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2012west 3055 (2012.05)

Title

Paragraph (3) (c) of paragraph (3) shall not apply to the scope of purchase costs, lease, etc. and the kinds of evidential documents, as there is no evidence of major expenses.

Summary

In cases where it is possible to separately calculate major expenses included in inventory assets as of the end of the relevant taxable year as of the end of the relevant taxable year prescribed in paragraph (3) (c) of the notification, it refers to cases where it is possible to separate and calculate major expenses not included in inventory assets at the end of the relevant taxable year by collecting evidence of the principal expenses at the end of the relevant taxable year. It may not be applied to

Cases

2014du3280 Global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

IsaA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Geumcheon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2013Nu22507 Decided January 15, 2014

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the ground of appeal on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to have been rejected or not.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow