logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.04.28 2015고단8004
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. by the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Incheon Detention House on November 10, 2014.

On December 28, 2014, the Defendant posted a false statement stating that “The sales of a reference document is sold” on the Internet NAVVand High National Cafs, and reported the above writing to the victim C who made a false statement stating that “The sales proceeds of KRW 24,000 shall be sent on the face of the week.”

However, the defendant did not have a reference document for sale, and there was no intention or ability to issue a reference document even if he received money from the injured party because he thought that the sales proceeds received from the injured person will be used for the defendant's living expenses.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received KRW 24,00 from the victim's bank account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant from the victim, and received KRW 24,00 from the victim to November 5, 2015, totaling KRW 16,060,100 from 77 victims over 77 times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

On April 3, 2015, Defendant 122 of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 15:10, 2015, Defendant 61, 61, 61, and 314 of the Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, a destination destination, after having arrived at the seat of 314 of the "Triwon", Defendant 15:10 on April 3, 2015, Defendant 43, and (transported Dong) of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Seoul. The victim false statement was made to the victim “I will have a taxi fee because he/she has lived in the house.”

However, the defendant had no occupation at the time, and had no family or other property to pay the taxi fee to the victim. Therefore, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee even if he gets in the taxi.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.

arrow