A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

gallon ju (SM-N920S) 5 p.m. (T. Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office) 2017.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a crime of fraud at the Jinwon District Court's Jinwon Branch's Jin, but the suspended sentence was revoked on April 11, 2014. On June 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc., and on November 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one month of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the same court on June 14, 2015, and completed the execution of that sentence in the Ansan prison on June 14, 2015.

[2] On June 9, 2017, the Defendant posted a false statement on June 9, 2017, stating that he/she would sell the Gu’s ice on the Internet’s bulletin board, which is a medium-sized and trading website, at the Defendant’s dwelling at Ansan-si apartment 206 Dong-dong, 901, and that he/she would deliver the Gu’s ice to the victim N who contacted with the Defendant.

However, since the defendant did not have old Dashes, even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send old Doshes with new Doshes.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 380,00 from the victims of the Daegu Bank Account (O) in the name of the Defendant, and thereafter, received KRW 11,536,010 from the victims up to 77 times in total as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1) by October 17, 2017, including the transfer of KRW 11,536,010 from the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property from the victims.

Around August 1, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter stating that he/she sold mar card to a Korean national car page from the Gu-U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.P. S. S. S. S.P

“.......”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have a discharge card, so even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the discharge card.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and on the same day.