The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. The Plaintiff asserts that “It is unreasonable to suspect the authenticity of the refugee application on the ground that the Plaintiff, who was dedicated to job-seeking activities for about four years and eight months after entering the Republic of Korea, applied for refugee status later,” and the Plaintiff is bound to undergo continuous intimidation from the SJM on the ground that the Plaintiff refused the request for political donation from the SJM, and the protection from the NNM cannot be expected. Therefore, the Plaintiff is a person who is subject to political persecution and constitutes a refugee.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court were examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.