logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.18 2017누38388
난민불인정결정취소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment by this court under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, this is also accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff asserts that this court's additional decision in this court is a political group that mainly sleeps daily Germany, collective farm system, and revolution spread, as a publicist who inferred the idea B, as the reasons for appeal. The plaintiff refused to join the organization even if he was forced to do so, which threatens both the plaintiff and the plaintiff's family members. The plaintiff is a member of a specific social group, who is subject to political gambling and thus is not likely to be protected by the NAP government, and therefore constitutes a refugee.

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court were examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on this conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow