Text
1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, the Defendant Republic of Korea shall have jurisdiction over the Busan District Court's Dong Branch of the District Court.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on April 28, 1942 with respect to the land of 1326 square meters in Busan-gun, Busan-gun (hereinafter “land before division”).
B. (1) Article 8 of the former State Property Act (amended by Act No. 6072 of Dec. 31, 1999) and Article 4 of the former Enforcement Decree of the State Property Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 15487 of Oct. 1, 1997) stipulate the procedure for acquiring intangible real estate through publication in the Official Gazette and daily newspapers stating that “The office of general administration or the office of administration shall acquire such real estate as State property, if there is no report by the person claiming a legitimate right to the real estate within six months after the publication.”
(2) The Defendant Republic of Korea: (a) recognized the land before subdivision as non-owned real estate owned by Japan; and (b) completed the registration of entire co-owners’ share transfer (hereinafter “the registration of ownership transfer of this case”) under the name of the Defendant Republic of Korea on September 11, 1948 under the name of Busan District Court, Busan District Court No. 96936, Oct. 8, 1997, which was received on October 8, 1997 by identifying the land before subdivision as non-owned real estate owned by Japan.
C. On November 6, 2001, the land before subdivision was divided into each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”). Under the concession agreement concluded with the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the Defendant Busan Busan Busan Highway Co., Ltd. constructed the said land on a daily unit including each of the above land and donated it to the Defendant Republic of Korea and manage the said road upon receiving management and operation rights granted.
The Plaintiff, registered as the owner of each of the instant lands, on the premise that C, D, and E is “F”, “G”, and “H” on each of the respective copies of each of the instant lands, based on the premise that the Plaintiff was “F”, “G”, and “H,” and other 47 successors of F, G, and H, were on the ground of termination of each of the instant respective shares of each of the instant lands under title trust by the court 2013